This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-04-11 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| Code and they did not execute any prenuptial agreement as to their property relations. Thus, the legal presumption of the conjugal nature of the property applies to the lot in question. The presumption that the property is conjugal property may be rebutted only by strong, clear, categorical, and convincing evidence there must be strict proof of the exclusive ownership of one of the spouses, and the burden of proof rests upon the party asserting it.[25] Aside from the assertions of Elenita that the sale of the property by her father and her aunt was in the nature of a donation because of the alleged gross disparity between the actual value of the property and the monetary consideration for the sale, there is no other | |||||