This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-11-11 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| The Court, in its pursuit of speedy disposition of justice, is not unmindful of the circumstances that may justify the delay in the disposition of cases assigned to judges. It remains sympathetic to seasonably filed requests for extensions of time to decide cases.[11] It is not unusual for this Court, upon proper application and in meritorious cases, especially when difficult questions of law or complex issues are involved, to grant judges of lower courts additional time to decide beyond the 90-day period. All that a judge needs to do is request for an extension of time over which the Court has, almost customarily, been considerate.[12] The respondent Judge did not avail of such remedy. | |||||
|
2005-04-26 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Verily, a judge must manage his court with a view to the prompt and convenient disposition of its business.[21] The Court, in its pursuit of speedy dispensation of justice, is not unmindful of circumstances that may delay the disposition of the cases assigned to judges. It remains sympathetic to seasonably filed requests for extensions of time to decide cases.[22] | |||||