This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-03-13 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| We agree with the CSC. We uphold its decision to relax the procedural rules because Paler's appeal was meritorious. This is not the first time that the Court has upheld such exercise of discretion. In Rosales, Jr. v. Mijares[25] involving Section 49(a) of the CSC Revised Rules of Procedure, the Court ruled: On the contention of the petitioner that the appeal of the respondent to the CSC was made beyond the period therefor under Section 49(a) of the CSC Revised Rules of Procedure, the CSC correctly ruled that: | |||||