Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PASCUAL v. MEMBERS OF TRAMO WAKAS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION

This case has been cited 9 times or more.

	GR No. 154366 2010-11-17	CEBU BIONIC BUILDERS SUPPLY v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PHILIPPINES LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Except for the powers which are expressly conferred on it by the Corporation Code and those that are implied by or are incidental to its existence, a corporation has no powers. It exercises its powers through its board of directors and/or its duly authorized officers and agents. Thus, its power to sue and be sued in any court is lodged with the board of directors that exercises its corporate powers.[53] Physical acts, like the signing of documents, can be performed only by natural persons duly authorized for the purpose by corporate by-laws or by a specific act of the board of directors.[54]
	GR No. 161368 2010-04-05	MEDISERV v. CA VILLARAMA, JR., J.
The requirement that a petitioner or principal party should sign the certificate of non-forum shopping applies even to corporations, considering that the mandatory directives of the Rules of Court make no distinction between natural and juridical persons. [23] A corporation, however, exercises its powers through its board of directors and/or its duly authorized officers and agents. Physical acts, like the signing of documents, can be performed only by natural persons duly authorized for the purpose by corporate by-laws or by a specific act of the board of directors. [24]
	GR No. 170625 2008-10-17	BANK OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. CA TINGA, J.
With more reason should the instant case be allowed since petitioner did submit a certification against forum shopping, failing only to show proof that the signatory was authorized to do so. In Shipside Incorporated v. Court of Appeals,[44] Ateneo de Naga University v. Manalo,[45] Pascual & Santos Inc. v. The Member of the Tramo Wakas Neighborhood Association, Inc.[46] and China Banking Corporation v. Mondragon International Philippines, Inc.,[47] the Court permitted the subsequent submission of proof of authority to sign the certification against forum shopping.
	GR NO. 159422 2008-03-28	CHINESE YMCA OF MANILA DOWNTOWN v. REGISTER OF DEEDS AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
corporations, considering that the mandatory directives of the Rules of Court make no distinction between natural and juridical persons.[22] Except for the powers which are expressly conferred on it by the Corporation Code and those that are implied by or are incidental to its existence, a corporation has no powers.It exercises its powers through its board of directors and/or its duly authorized officers and
	GR NO. 159422 2008-03-28	CHINESE YMCA OF MANILA DOWNTOWN v. REGISTER OF DEEDS AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
agents.[23] Thus, its power to sue and be sued in any court is lodged with the board of directors that exercises its corporate powers.[24] Physical acts, like the signing of documents, can be performed only by natural persons duly authorized for the purpose by corporate by-laws or by a specific act of the board of directors.[25] The purpose of requiring a verification is to secure an assurance that the allegations of the petition have been made in good faith, or are true and correct, not merely speculative.[26] On the other hand, the rule against forum shopping is rooted in the
	GR NO. 159422 2008-03-28	CHINESE YMCA OF MANILA DOWNTOWN v. REGISTER OF DEEDS AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
agents.[23] Thus, its power to sue and be sued in any court is lodged with the board of directors that exercises its corporate powers.[24] Physical acts, like the signing of documents, can be performed only by natural persons duly authorized for the purpose by corporate by-laws or by a specific act of the board of directors.[25] The purpose of requiring a verification is to secure an assurance that the allegations of the petition have been made in good faith, or are true and correct, not merely speculative.[26] On the other hand, the rule against forum shopping is rooted in the
	GR NO. 159422 2008-03-28	CHINESE YMCA OF MANILA DOWNTOWN v. REGISTER OF DEEDS AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
agents.[23] Thus, its power to sue and be sued in any court is lodged with the board of directors that exercises its corporate powers.[24] Physical acts, like the signing of documents, can be performed only by natural persons duly authorized for the purpose by corporate by-laws or by a specific act of the board of directors.[25] The purpose of requiring a verification is to secure an assurance that the allegations of the petition have been made in good faith, or are true and correct, not merely speculative.[26] On the other hand, the rule against forum shopping is rooted in the
	GR NO. 166279 2006-06-30	PHILIPPINE RABBIT BUS LINES v. ALADDIN TRANSIT CORP. CARPIO MORALES, J.
The requirement that the petitioner sign the certificate of non-forum shopping applies even to corporations as the mandatory directives of the Rules of Court make no distinction between natural and juridical persons.[30]
	GR NO. 159653 2006-01-25	LDP MARKETING v. ERLINDA DYOLDE MONTER CARPIO MORALES, J.
The requirement that a petitioner or principal party should sign the certificate of non-forum shopping applies even to corporations, considering that the mandatory directives of the Rules of Court make no distinction between natural and juridical persons.[13]