Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 167239 2010-05-05	HICOBLINO M. CATLY v. WILLIAM NAVARRO PERALTA, J.
SO ORDERED.[45]
	GR NO. 142236 2006-09-27	FILIPRO v. PERMANENT SAVINGS YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In addition, the basis of the trial court's November 7, 1989 Order was the compromise agreement entered into among the petitioner, Allied Bank and Philbank. Once stamped with judicial imprimatur, a compromise agreement becomes more than a mere contract binding upon the parties; having the sanction of the court and entered as its determination of the controversy, it has the force and effect of any other judgment.[25] Since a judgment based on a compromise agreement is no different from any other judgment, once it attains finality, it can no longer be subject to any alteration, modification or review.