This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-09-17 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Denial, as a defense, is an inherently weak one[28] and has been viewed by this Court with disdain, for it can easily be concocted and is a very common line of defense in prosecutions arising from violations of RA 9165.[29] Similarly, the defense of frame-up is also easily fabricated and commonly used in buy-bust cases.[30] | |||||