Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

ALFREDO APUYAN v. EVANGELINE A. HALDEMAN

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 159746 2012-07-18	SPS. RAMON MENDIOLA AND ARACELI N. MENDIOLA v. CA BERSAMIN, J.
In Apuyan v. Haldeman,[30] too, the Court categorized an order denying the motion for reconsideration as the final resolution of the issues a trial court earlier passed upon and decided, and accordingly held that the notice of appeal filed against the order of denial was deemed to refer to the decision subject of the motion for reconsideration.[31]
	GR No. 178933 2009-09-16	RICARDO S. SILVERIO v. CA VELASCO JR., J.
The CA, however, ruled that the filing of the Notice of Appeal in this case was proper saying that the appeal pertained to the earlier Omnibus Order dated May 31, 2005. The CA, citing Apuyan v. Haldeman,[18] argued that an order denying a motion for reconsideration may be appealed as such order is the "final order" which disposes of the case. In that case, we stated: In the recent case of Quelnan v. VHF Philippines, Inc., We held, thus:
	GR No. 176141 2008-12-16	GERTRUDES NABUA v. DOUGLAS LU YM REYES, R.T., J.
Petitioners moved to dismiss respondent's appeal before the CA, based on the theory that the notice of appeal stated that it was an appeal from the order denying the motion for reconsideration. As Apuyan v. Haldeman[32] directs, an appeal from an order of a denial of a motion for reconsideration should also be deemed to refer to the decision of the trial court.
	GR No. 170409 2008-01-28	GREGORIA MARTINEZ v. CA TINGA, J,
In Apuyan v. Haldeman,[37] also cited by petitioner, it was held that a certificate of title issued on the basis of a free patent procured through fraud or in violation of the law may be cancelled, as such title is not cloaked with indefeasibility.
	GR NO. 141524 2005-09-14	DOMINGO NEYPES v. DEL MUNDO
This pronouncement was reiterated in the more recent case of Apuyan v. Haldeman et al.[14] where we again considered the order denying petitioner Apuyan's motion for reconsideration as the final order which finally disposed of the issues involved in the case.