This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2012-12-10 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| Before an injunctive writ can be issued, it is essential that the following requisites are present: (1) there must be a right inesse or the existence of a right to be protected; and (2) the act against which injunction to be directed is a violation of such right. The onus probandi is on movant to show that there exists a right to be protected, which is directly threatened by the act sought to be enjoined. Further, there must be a showing that the invasion of the right is material and substantial and that there is an urgent and paramount necessity for the writ to prevent a serious damage.[105] | |||||
|
2010-10-13 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| A corporation has a legal status only within the state or territory in which it was organized. For this reason, a corporation organized in another country has no personality to file suits in the Philippines. In order to subject a foreign corporation doing business in the country to the jurisdiction of our courts, it must acquire a license from the Securities and Exchange Commission and appoint an agent for service of process. Without such license, it cannot institute a suit in the Philippines.[24] | |||||
|
2005-09-23 |
|||||
| Estoppel is deeply rooted in the axiom of commodum ex injuria sua non habere debet no person ought to derive any advantage from his own wrong.[50] | |||||