This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2014-08-13 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| Article 291 covers claims for overtime pay,[43] holiday pay,[44] service incentive leave pay,[45] bonuses,[46] salary differentials,[47] and illegal deductions by an employer.[48] It also covers money claims arising from seafarer contracts.[49] | |||||
|
2010-10-20 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| We similarly ruled in Texon Manufacturing v. Millena,[29] in Sime Darby Employees Association v. National Labor Relations Commission[30] and in Westmont Pharmaceuticals v. Samaniego. [31] In Texon, we specifically said: The Order of the Labor Arbiter denying petitioners' motion to dismiss is interlocutory. It is well-settled that a denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint is an interlocutory order and hence, cannot be appealed, until a final judgment on the merits of the case is rendered. [Emphasis supplied.][32] | |||||
|
2006-07-20 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| On its face, the petition of respondent for mandamus does not state a cause of action for a writ of mandamus. The rule is that a cause of action has the following elements: (a) the legal right of the plaintiff; (b) the correlative obligation of the defendant to respect that legal right; and (c) an act or omission of the defendant that violates such right.[46] The cause of action does not accrue until the party obligated refuses, expressly or impliedly, to comply with its duty.[47] | |||||
|
2005-06-23 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Well-settled is the rule that since a cause of action requires, as essential elements, not only a legal right of the plaintiff and a correlative duty of the defendant but also "an act or omission of the defendant in violation of said legal right," the cause of action does not accrue until the party obligated refuses, expressly or impliedly, to comply with its duty.[12] | |||||