This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-09-14 |
VELASCO, JR., J. |
||||
| Moreover, the retaliation of the accused in Romero v. People,[29] although not considered an unlawful aggression, was nevertheless deemed as sufficient provocation. The Court explained, "Thrusting his bolo at petitioner, threatening to kill him, and hacking the bamboo walls of his house are, in our view, sufficient provocation to enrage any man, or stir his rage and obfuscate his thinking, more so when the lives of his wife and children are in danger."[30] | |||||