This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-04-11 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| The present case falls under the 7th exception, as the RTC and the CA arrived at conflicting findings of fact and conclusions of law. The conferment of a legal easement of right of way is governed by Articles 649 and 650 of the Civil Code, quoted below for easy reference:[16] Article 649. The owner, or any person who by virtue of a real right may cultivate or use any immovable, which is surrounded by other immovables pertaining to other persons and without adequate outlet to a public highway, is entitled to demand a right of way through the | |||||