You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ATTY. RODOLFO D. PACTOLIN v. FOURTH DIVISION OF SANDIGANBAYAN

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR Nos. 166086-92
2009-02-13
ELENO T. REGIDOR v. PEOPLE
NACHURA, J.
Based on the foregoing disquisitions, the Sandiganbayan's conviction of petitioners had ample factual mooring, after the prosecution presented both documentary and testimonial pieces of evidence. Time and again, we held that we are not a trier of facts; hence, we defer to the factual findings of the Sandiganbayan which had more opportunity and facilities to examine and evaluate the evidence presented.[44]