This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-11-18 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Despite this established fact, respondent still tries to refute the charge of dishonesty by claiming that the actual examinee impersonated him and took the test without his knowledge. Indeed, to be found guilty of dishonesty, there must be substantial evidence that respondent intentionally made false statements or practiced deception in securing his permanent employment with the Sandiganbayan.[19] | |||||
|
2014-07-08 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Citing Office of the Court Administrator v. Bermejo,[16] Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document: Benjamin R. Katly, Information Technology Officer I, Systems Development for Judicial Application Division, MISO[17] and Retired Employee v. Merlyn G. Manubag,[18] the OCA found respondent guilty of dishonesty and falsification of official documents. They recommended that the administrative complaint be docketed as a regular administrative matter. They also recommended the dismissal of respondent from service with forfeiture of all retirement benefits, and disqualification from employment in any government office including government-owned and controlled corporations.[19] | |||||