Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 175380 2010-03-22	GREGORIO ESPINOZA v. UNITED OVERSEAS BANK PHILS. CORONA, J.
In another case involving these two parties, Fernandez and United Overseas Bank Phils. v. Espinoza,[15] we held: Upon the expiration of the redemption period, the right of the purchaser to the possession of the foreclosed property becomes absolute. The basis of this right to possession is the purchaser's ownership of the property.[16]
	GR No. 178330 2009-07-23	MARTIN T. SAGARBARRIA v. PHILIPPINE BUSINESS BANK NACHURA, J.
Neither was there a need for the court to suspend the proceedings merely and solely because of the pendency of the complaint for the nullification of the real estate mortgage and the foreclosure proceedings. As held by this Court in Fernandez v. Espinoza:[19]