Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 162100 2012-01-18	PENTA CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION v. TEODORO BAY SERENO, J.
Before us is a consolidated Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 impugning the Decision dated 30 July 2003 and Resolution dated 9 February 2004 of the Court of Appeals,[1] which modified the interests applied by the trial court in computing
	GR No. 190823 2011-04-04	DOMINGO CARABEO v. VS.SPS. NORBERTO CARPIO MORALES, J.
Clutching at straws, petitioner proffers lack of spousal consent. This was raised only on appeal, hence, will not be considered, in the present case, in the interest of fair play, justice and due process.[10]
	GR No. 171980 2010-10-06	PEOPLE v. OLIVE RUBIO MAMARIL PEREZ, J.
In a long line of cases, this Court held that points of law, theories, issues and arguments not adequately brought to the attention of the trial court ordinarily will not be considered by a reviewing court as they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal because this would be offensive to the basic rules of fair play, justice and due process.[34]