You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

REINEL ANT B. DE CASTRO v. ANNABELLE ASSIDAO-DE CASTRO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 196049
2013-06-26
MINORU FUJIKI v. MARIA PAZ GALELA MARINAY
CARPIO, J.
Moreover, the Solicitor General argued that there is no jurisdictional infirmity in assailing a void marriage under Rule 108, citing De Castro v. De Castro[39] and Niñal v. Bayadog[40] which declared that "[t]he validity of a void marriage may be collaterally attacked."[41]