You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

JAIME RACINES v. JUDGE JOSE P. MORALLOS and SHERIFF III BENJAMIN CABUSAO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 190529
2011-03-22
PHILIPPINE GUARDIANS BROTHERHOOD v. COMELEC
BRION, J.
In Alcantara v. Ponce,[29] the Court, instead of citing the respondent Atty. Escareal-Sandejas for contempt, chose to reprimand her (and warned her that her commission of the same act would be more drastically dealt with) noting her apparent inexperience in practice of the profession, especially in appellate proceedings before the Court.  Similarly, in Racines v. Judge Morallos,[30] the Court, after finding Jaime Racines guilty of indirect contempt, merely reprimanded him because "he is not learned in the intricacies of the law."