Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 162230 2014-08-12	ISABELITA C. VINUYA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ALBERTO G. ROMULO BERSAMIN, J.
(c) There is an urgent need for the writ to prevent irreparable injury to the applicant; and no other ordinary, speedy, and adequate remedy exists to prevent the infliction of irreparable injury.[26]
	GR No. 173036 2012-09-26	AGOO RICE MILL CORPORATION v. LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES BRION, J.
The existence of the ARMC's claimed right to the loan restructuring, however, was not clearly established by the ARMC. A party seeking to avail of an injunctive relief must prove that he or she possesses a right in esse or one that is actual or existing.[47] Such right must be clear and unmistakable,[48] and not contingent, abstract or future rights, or one that may never arise.[49]
	GR No. 178411 2010-06-23	OFFICE OF CITY MAYOR OF PARAÑAQUE CITY v. MARIO D. EBIO VILLARAMA, JR., J.
A right in esse means a clear and unmistakable right.[34] A party seeking to avail of an injunctive relief must prove that he or she possesses a right in esse or one that is actual or existing.[35] It should not be contingent, abstract, or future rights, or one which may never arise.[36]