Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 199082 2012-09-18	JOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERALTA, J.
In a preliminary investigation, the Rules of Court guarantee the petitioners basic due process rights such as the right to be furnished a copy of the complaint, the affidavits, and other supporting documents, and the right to submit counter-affidavits, and other supporting documents in her defense.[122] Admittedly, GMA received the notice requiring her to submit her counter-affidavit. Yet, she did not comply, allegedly because she could not prepare her counter-affidavit. She claimed that she was not furnished by Senator Pimentel pertinent documents that she needed to adequately prepare her counter-affidavit.
	GR NO. 131723 2007-12-13	MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. T.E.A.M. ELECTRONICS CORPORATION NACHURA, J.
On January 13, 1989, TEC and TPC filed a complaint for damages against petitioner and Ultra[17] before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig. The case was raffled to Branch 162 and was docketed as Civil Case No. 56851.[18] Upon the filing of the parties' answer to the complaint, pre-trial was scheduled.