Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 205300 2015-03-18	FONTERRA BRANDS PHILS. v. LEONARDO LARGADO VELASCO JR., J.
By refusing to renew their contracts with Zytron, respondents effectively resigned from the latter. Resignation is the voluntary act of employees who are compelled by personal reasons to dissociate themselves from their employment, done with the intention of relinquishing an office, accompanied by the act of abandonment.[5]
	GR No. 198733 2012-10-10	JOHANSEN WORLD GROUP CORPORATION v. RENE MANUEL GONZALES III CARPIO, J.
As a general rule, this Court, not being a trier of facts, will not routinely undertake the re-examination of the evidence presented by the contending parties, in consonance with the rule that the findings of fact of the Court of Appeals are conclusive and binding on the Court.[9] Factual findings of labor officials who are deemed to have acquired expertise in matters within their respective jurisdiction are likewise generally accorded not only respect, but even finality, as long as the findings are supported by substantial evidence.[10]
	GR No. 175371 2008-04-30	BENITO J. BRIZUELA v. ABRAHAM DINGLE CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Second, this Court already pronounced in Carlos v. Court of Appeals,[35] that prescinding from Section 10, Rule XI of the NLRC Rules of Procedure, which reads -