Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 152006 2009-10-02	MONTANO PICO v. CATALINA ADALIM-SALCEDO BRION, J.
In their Petition for Review on Certiorari,[1] petitioners Montano Pico and Rosita Pico (collectively Picos) assail the Court of Appeals (CA) decision[2] in CA-G.R. CV No. 50278, affirming the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 27, Tandag, Surigao del Sur. The RTC decision, in turn, declared respondent spouses Catalina Salcedo (Catalina) and Urbano Salcedo (collectively Salcedos) as the owners of the entire Lot No. 1188 Cad. 392-D, covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 5930, and ordered the Picos to vacate the portion of Lot No. 1188 that they are occupying.
	GR No. 165407 2009-06-05	HERMINIGILDO INGUILLO v. FIRST PHILIPPINE SCALES PERALTA, J.
Corollarily, procedural due process in the dismissal of employees requires notice and hearing. The employer must furnish the employee two written notices before termination may be effected. The first notice apprises the employee of the particular acts or omissions for which his dismissal is sought, while the second notice informs the employee of the employer's decision to dismiss him.[49] The requirement of a hearing, on the other hand, is complied with as long as there was an opportunity to be heard, and not necessarily that an actual hearing was conducted.[50]