This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2015-03-11 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| The Court shall first delve on the procedural issue of the case. In Imperial v. Court of Appeals,[22] the Court ruled: In a long line of cases starting with Habaluyas Enterprises v. Japzon, we have laid down the following guideline: | |||||
|
2013-07-24 |
PERLAS-BERNABE, J. |
||||
| Further, the appellate court cited the case of Imperial v. CA (Imperial),[28] where the Court upheld the validity of the publication of the notice of the petition in the March 27, 1995 and April 3, 1995 issues of the Official Gazette despite the NPO certification that the last issue (pertaining to the April 3, 1995 issue) was officially released on March 28, 1995. The Court observed in the Imperial case that it is not uncommon among publishing companies to release issues before the actual date of issue reflected on the cover of the publication. What matters is that the petitioner in a reconstitution case caused the publication of the notice of the petition in two (2) consecutive issues of the Official Gazette thirty (30) days prior to the date of hearing. | |||||