This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-02-27 |
PUNO, CJ. |
||||
| The ruling in Social Security System (SSS) v. Department of Agrarian Reform[23] is apropos. In this case, the former landowner, the SSS, made a similar attempt to circumvent the jurisdiction of the DARAB by filing a complaint for recovery of possession with the RTC of San Mateo, Rizal. When the RTC dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, the SSS came to this court for recourse. We ruled:Irrefragably, the titles sought to be annulled by the SSS, namely, TCTs No. 1259 No. 1260 and No. 1261 originated from the CLOAs issued by the DAR in pursuance of, and in accordance with, the provisions of Rep. Act No. 6657, the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program. | |||||
|
2005-06-30 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Not too long ago, in the case of SSS v. DAR,[24] this Court resolving the same issues of (1) what constitutes an agrarian dispute, (2) what are the cases involving the issuance of CLOAs; and (3) which body has jurisdiction over controversies arising therefrom, held:Section 1, Rule II, 2002 DARAB Rules of Procedure provides that: | |||||