This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2013-01-30 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| We do not see these documentary pieces of evidence as proof of specific acts constituting deceit or fraud on the respondent's part. The documents by themselves are neutral and, at the most, show the breakdown of the attorney-client relationship between the respondent and the complainant. It is one thing to allege deceit and misconduct, and it is another to demonstrate by evidence the specific acts constituting these allegations.[72] | |||||
|
2007-09-07 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| Administrative proceedings against lawyers are sui generis[51] and they belong to a class of their own.[52] They are neither civil nor criminal actions but rather investigations by the Court into the conduct of its officer.[53] They involve no private interest and afford no redress for private grievance.[54] | |||||