Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR NO. 166975 2006-09-15	HEIRS OF BASILISA HERNANDEZ v. BERNARDO VERGARA GARCIA, J.
In Garcia vs. Zosa, Jr.,[8] this matter is clearly explained, to wit:The fundamental issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the MTC has jurisdiction over the forcible entry case. Section 33 of B.P. Blg. 129, as amended, provides:
	GR No. 119088 2000-06-30	ZAIDA RUBY S. ALBERTO v. . CA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Indeed, it is irrefutable that the Second Amended Complaint contains no allegation that plaintiff-appellant's prayer for attorney's fees equivalent to 3 1/2 hectares in Civil Case No. 57023 is bound to be prejudiced by the Deed of Sale executed by the said spouses in favor of defendant-appellee Yolanda P. Alano. Appellant's submission, that exhaustion of the properties of her said former clients is not essential to the accrual of her cause of action, is untenable. To repeat: from the remaining twelve (12) hectares of her former clients may be taken her (appellant's) attorney's fees of 3 1/2 hectares."[9]