This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2010-02-26 |
ABAD, J. |
||||
| The requirement of CSC approval of qualification standards is demonstrated in Paredes v. Civil Service Commission,[9] where the Court held that the CSC was in error in applying qualification standards that it had not previously approved. Not even the exigencies of the service can justify the use of unapproved qualification standards. Said the Court: Without a duly approved Qualification Standard it would be extremely difficult if not impossible for the appointing authority to determine the qualification and fitness of the applicant for the particular position. Without an approved Qualification Standard the appointing authority would have no basis or guide in extending a promotional or original appointment in filling up vacant positions in its department or agency. Public interest therefore requires that a Qualification Standard must exist to guide the appointing authority not only in extending an appointment but also in settling contested appointments.[10] | |||||
|
2007-07-30 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| x x x x x x x x x (emphasis supplied) Thus, the CES covers presidential appointees only. As this Court ruled in Office of the Ombudsman v. CSC:[8] | |||||