You're currently signed in as:
User

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. FELINO M. TIMBOL

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2007-04-12
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
Secondly, the assailed September 20, 1999 Resolution of the Court of Appeals granting respondent's application for a writ of preliminary injunction enjoining the implementation of the trial court's Omnibus Order canceling his bail, is bereft of any factual or legal basis. To be entitled to an injunctive writ, the applicant must show that (1) he has a clear existing right to be protected; and (2) the acts against which the injunction is to be directed are in violation of such right.[8]