You're currently signed in as:
User

JOSEFINA ESTOLAS v. RAYMUNDO ACENA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2007-02-14
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Coming now to the issue on damages, Meralco's gross negligence in the performance of the maintenance of its devices and equipment and its arbitrary issuance of a differential billing to Victoria brought upon the latter much anxiety and aggravation.[29]  It should therefore be liable to her for moral damages.  It should also be liable for exemplary damages to curb similar arbitrary practices.[30]