Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

FELISA L. PEÑA v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 172438 2012-07-04	METROPOLITAN CEBU WATER DISTRICT v. MACTAN ROCK INDUSTRIES MENDOZA, J.
This is consistent with the principle that when an administrative agency or body is conferred quasi-judicial functions, all controversies relating to the subject matter pertaining to its specialization are deemed to be included within its jurisdiction since the law does not sanction a split of jurisdiction, as stated in Peña v. Government Service Insurance System.[54]
	GR No. 176596 2011-03-23	JUDGE ADORACION G. ANGELES v. MANUEL E. GAITE PERALTA, J.
In Peña v. Government Service Insurance System,[29] we held that: x x x it is axiomatic that final and executory judgments can no longer be attacked by any of the parties or be modified, directly or indirectly, even by the highest court of the land. Just as the losing party has the right to file an appeal within the prescribed period, so also the winning party has the correlative right to enjoy the finality of the resolution of the case.[30]
	GR No. 175803 2009-12-04	GOVERNOR ORLANDO A. FUA v. COA PERALTA, J.
Petitioner having failed to pursue an appeal with the Commission Proper, the Decision issued by the COA-LAO-Local has become final and executory. In Peña v. Government Service Insurance System,[12] the Court held that: x x x it is axiomatic that final and executory judgments can no longer be attacked by any of the parties or be modified, directly or indirectly, even by the highest court of the land. Just as the losing party has the right to file an appeal within the prescribed period, so also the winning party has the correlative right to enjoy the finality of the resolution of the case.[13]
	GR No. 131903 2008-06-26	RAGASA v. CA CARPIO, J.
In Peña v. GSIS,[28] the Court ruled that when an administrative agency is conferred quasi-judicial functions, all controversies relating to the subject matter pertaining to its specialization are deemed to be included within its jurisdiction. Split jurisdiction is not favored.