Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 178733 2014-09-15	ELISA ANGELES v. CA DEL CASTILLO, J.
In a November 15, 2005 Order,[9] the trial court directed that the entire record of Civil Case No. 69213 be transmitted to the CA for appropriate action.
	GR No. 178733 2014-09-15	ELISA ANGELES v. CA DEL CASTILLO, J.
In her Comment,[14] Martin sought the dismissal of the Petition, alleging that as a mere court employee and researcher, she had no authority or control over the proceedings in Civil Case No. 69213, as well as the issuance or implementation of the court's orders; that the non-transmittal of the records to the CA was not intentional but came as a result of the trial court's giving due course to the various motions filed by the parties; that she had no hand in the enforcement of the writ of execution pending appeal as she had no power or authority to direct its implementation; and that she did not commit any irregular or illegal act as to be held liable for contempt of court.
	GR No. 178413 2008-03-13	AQUILINO L. PIMENTEL III v. COMELEC EN BANC SITTING AS NATIONAL BOARD OF CANVASSERS CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
The writ of mandamus shall be issued only if the legal right to be enforced is well defined, clear and certain. It lies only to compel an officer to perform a ministerial duty, not a discretionary one. The duty is ministerial only when its discharge requires neither the exercise of official discretion nor judgment. [47]