This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-09-27 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Admittedly, it was not conclusively proven that respondent had illicit affairs with a man other than her husband, as no one actually saw her having sexual intercourse with him. However, immorality is not based alone on illicit sexual intercourse. It is "not confined to sexual matters, but includes conducts inconsistent with rectitude, or indicative of corruption, indecency, depravity, and dissoluteness; or is willful, flagrant or shameless conduct showing moral indifference to opinions of respectable members of the community, and as an inconsiderate attitude toward good order and public welfare."[11] In Zaguirre v. Castillo,[12] we reiterated the definition of immoral conduct as such conduct which is so willful, flagrant, or shameless as to show indifference to the opinion of good and respectable members of the community. | |||||