You're currently signed in as:
User

GAMBOA v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2009-04-24
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
The claim in this case is one for reimbursement of the sum of money paid by FGU Insurance Corporation to RAGC.  This is not one for forbearance of money, goods or credit.  Forbearance in the context of the usury law is a contractual obligation of lender or creditor to refrain, during a given period of time, from requiring the borrower or debtor to repay a loan or debt then due and payable.[1]  Thus the interest rate should be as it is hereby fixed at 6%.  Moreover, the interest rate of 6% shall be computed from the date of filing of the complaint, i.e., April 10, 1995.  This is in accordance with the ruling that where the demand cannot be established with reasonable certainty, the interest shall begin to run only from the date the judgment of the court is made (at which time the quantification of damages may be deemed to have been reasonably ascertained). The actual base for the computation of legal interest shall, in any case, be on the amount finally adjudged.[2]