This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2013-06-03 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Respondent has been served several Memoranda on various dates requiring him to explain the complained acts but not a single occasion did he comply with the orders of his superior. Clearly, this shows his propensity to disregard and disobey lawful orders of his superior.[21] The Court also notes that when the OCA required him to comment on the complaint against him, respondent initially asked for extension within which to file the same, but to this date, no such compliance was made. | |||||
|
2013-06-03 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| also for the Court, which exercises direct administrative supervision over trial court officers and employees through the OCA.[23] His indifference to, and disregard of, the directives issued to him clearly constituted insubordination.[24] | |||||