You're currently signed in as:
User

CARMELITA CHIONG v. SHERWIN BALOLOY

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2007-10-18
PER CURIAM
Being among those at the grassroots of our judicial machinery, process servers are in close contact with litigants, hence, their conduct should all the more maintain the prestige and the integrity of the Court.[22]  For failing to live up to these standards, respondent should be dismissed.  The Court cannot countenance any conduct, act or omission, committed by those involved in administering justice, which violates the norm of public accountability and which erodes the faith of the people in the judiciary.[23]