This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-03-26 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| In Department of Agrarian Reform v. Oroville Development Corporation,[16] we held: [i]n order to be exempt from CARP coverage, the subject property must have been classified as industrial/residential before June 15, 1988. In this case, the DAR's examination of the zoning ordinances and certifications pertaining to the subject property, as well as its field investigation, disclosed that the same remains to be agricultural. The Zoning Certifications to the effect that the land is within the city's potential growth area for urban expansion are inconsequential as they do not reflect the present classification of the land but merely its intended land use. | |||||