This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2007-10-02 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED SERIOUS ERROR OF LAW WHEN IT DENIED THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED BY PETITIONER.[31] The first, second and fifth errors assigned by Overseas Bank, questioning the propriety of the default order and the venue of the action for nullification and assuming that Rosemoor Mining committed forum shopping, were already resolved by the Second Division of this Court in G.R. Nos. 159669 and 163521, promulgated on 12 March 2007.[32] As evidenced by the Entry of Judgment,[33] this consolidated Decision became final and executory on 14 September 2007. | |||||
|
2007-10-02 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| On 26 March 2002, Overseas Bank, instead of filing an Answer, filed a Motion to Dismiss Civil Case No. 215-M-02 on the ground of forum-shopping in view of the pendency of the other case involving the same parties and the same issues before the RTC of Manila.[13] | |||||