This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-10-27 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| In sum, the circumstances of the case are such, that for respondent, bail was not a matter of right but a mere privilege subject to the discretion of the CA to be exercised in accordance with the stringent requirements of Sec. 5, Rule 114. And Sec. 5 directs the denial or revocation of bail upon evidence of the existence of any of the circumstances enumerated therein [51] such as those indicating probability of flight if released on bail or undue risk that the accused may commit another crime during the pendency of the appeal. | |||||