Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RE: FINAL REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED AT MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF MIDSAYAP

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	AM No. P-04-1815 2007-10-18	RONCESVALLES B. FILOTEO v. ARTURO C. CALAGO PER CURIAM
Public office is a public trust.[9] A public servant must bear at all times the highest sense of honesty. This is especially significant for employees in the judiciary. The image of a court of justice is necessarily mirrored in the conduct, official or otherwise, of its personnel, from the judge to the lowest employee. Hence, those involved in the administration of justice must live up to the highest standard of honesty and integrity in the public service.[10] Not only must their conduct at all times be characterized by propriety and decorum but, above all else, it must be beyond suspicion.[11]
	AM NO. P-06-2103 2007-04-17	OCA v. ATTY. ROMULO V. PAREDES CORONA, J.
Public office is a public trust.[7] Those charged with the dispensation of justice, from the justices and judges to the lowliest clerks, should be circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility.[8] Not only must their conduct at all times be characterized by propriety and decorum but, above all else, it must be beyond suspicion.[9]
	AM NO. P-06-2177 2006-06-27	RE: REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED ON BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF ATTY. RAQUEL G. KHO CORONA, J.
Public office is a public trust.[4] Those charged with the dispensation of justice, from the justices and judges to the lowliest clerks, should be circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility.[5] Not only must their conduct at all times be characterized by propriety and decorum but, above all else, it must be beyond suspicion.[6]