This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-02-09 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the agreement.[46] In this case, Camacho admitted the existence of the contract as well as the genuineness of her signature. However, she claimed that she signed only upon the request of Atty. Banzon, who told her that the document would only be shown to the municipal councilors ("for formality's sake") to prove his authority in her behalf. It was never intended to bind her to pay him attorney's fees;[47] in short, petitioner insists that Camacho had not given her consent to the contract. | |||||