You're currently signed in as:
User

HERNANDO O. SIBULO v. MURIEL S. SAN JOSE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2006-04-28
CARPIO MORALES, J.
Respondents cannot escape administrative liability, however, for their failure to make periodic reports on the status of the Writ. Section 14 of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court explicitly mandates compliance with the manner in which a writ of execution is to be returned to the court, as well as the submission of periodic reports every 30 days until the judgment is fully satisfied,[29] the reason behind which being to update the court on the status of the execution so it could take necessary steps to ensure its speedy satisfaction.[30]