Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES CONSOLIDATED UNION v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION : CHAIRMAN

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 185812 2015-01-13	MARITIME INDUSTRY AUTHORITY v. COA LEONEN, J.
Action by the Department of Budget and Management is not required to implement Section 12 integrating allowances into the standardized salary.[77] Rather, an issuance by the Department of Budget and Management is required only if additional non-integrated allowances will be identified. Without this issuance from the Department of Budget and Management, the enumerated non-integrated allowances in Section 12 remain exclusive.[78]
	GR No. 185812 2015-01-13	MARITIME INDUSTRY AUTHORITY v. COA LEONEN, J.
On September 30, 1989, the Department of Budget and Management issued National Compensation Circular Nos. 56[6] and 59[7] implementing Republic Act No. 6758.
	GR No. 195687 2014-04-14	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. DAVID G. NAVAL VELASCO JR., J.
In Napocor Employees Consolidated Union (NECU) v. National Power Corporation,[50] we clarified that the nullification of DBM-CCC No. 10 is irrelevant to the validity of the provisions of the SSL: We hold that Rep. Act No. 6758 (Compensation and Classification Act of 1989) can be implemented notwithstanding our ruling in De Jesus vs. Commission on Audit. While it is true that in said case, this Court declared the nullity of DBM-CCC No. 10, yet there is nothing in our decision thereon suggesting or intimating the suspension of the effectivity of Rep. Act No. 6758 pending the publication in the Official Gazette of DBM-CCC No. 10. For sure, in Philippine International Trading Corporation vs. Commission on Audit, this Court specifically ruled that the nullity of DBM-CCC No. 10 will not affect the validity of Rep. Act No. 6758. Says this Court in that case:
	GR No. 153266 2010-03-18	VICTORIA C. GUTIERREZ v. DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET ABAD, J.
More importantly, the integration was not by mere legal fiction since it was factually integrated into the employees' salaries. Records show that the government employees were informed by their respective offices of their new position titles and their corresponding salary grades when they were furnished with the Notices of Position Allocation and Salary Adjustment (NPASA). The NPASA provided the breakdown of the employee's gross monthly salary as of June 30, 1989 and the composition of his standardized pay under R.A. 6758.[28] Notably, the COLA was considered part of the employee's monthly income.
	GR NO. 162716 2006-09-27	SECRETARY EMILIA T. BONCODIN OF DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION EMPLOYEES CONSOLIDATED UNION PANGANIBAN, CJ
A clear legal right means one clearly founded in or granted by law or is "enforceable as a matter of law."[18]