This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-09-12 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Petitioners cannot insist that the contract was subject to a suspensive condition,[16] that is, the stay of the judgment of the labor arbiter. This was not a condition for the perfection of the contract but merely a statement of the purpose of the bond in its "whereas" clauses. Aside from this, there was no mention of the condition that before the contract could become valid and binding, perfection of the appeal was necessary.[17] If the intention was to make it a suspensive condition, then the parties should have made it clear in certain and unambiguous terms. | |||||