Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR Nos. 140743 & 140745 2009-09-17	CITY GOVERNMENT OF TAGAYTAY v. ELEUTERIO F. GUERRERO NACHURA, J.
Every statute is understood to contain, by implication, if not by its express terms, all such provisions as may be necessary to effectuate its object and purpose, or to make effective the rights, powers, privileges, or jurisdiction which it grants, and also all such collateral and subsidiary consequences as may be fairly and logically inferred from its terms.[47]
	GR NOS. 170615-16 2009-07-09	REPUBLIC v. RUFINO V. MIJARES QUISUMBING, J.
In the meantime, on November 23, 2001, the Court of Appeals rendered a decision in the petition for review of the DAR decision finding the subject land exempt from CARP coverage.[11] This was later affirmed by the Supreme Court in a Decision dated June 15, 2006.[12]