This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-09-19 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| That the SPA is a forgery is a finding of the RTC and the CA on a question of fact.[25] The same is conclusive upon the Court, [26] especially as it is based on the expert opinion of the NBI which constitutes more than clear, positive and convincing evidence that respondent did not sign the SPA, and on the uncontroverted Certification of Dorado that respondent was in Germany working as a nurse when the SPA was purportedly executed in 1987. | |||||