This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-02-13 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| Prefatorily, the thrust of a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 is the resolution only of questions of law.[17] Any peripheral factual question addressed to this Court is beyond the ambit of this mode of review.[18] Indeed, well-entrenched is the general rule that the jurisdiction of this Court in cases brought before it from the CA is limited to reviewing or revising errors of law.[19] | |||||