Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

MELENCIO S. SY v. CARMELITA S. MONGCUPA

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	AM No. 2007-17-SC 2009-07-07	RE: UNAUTHORIZED DISPOSAL OF UNNECESSARY
Respondents violated their sacred trust as public servants and judicial officers. We shall never be less strict in applying only the highest standards of propriety, decorum, integrity, uprightness and honesty from the highest judicial officer of the land to the humblest court employee, for the ultimate power of this court lies in its incorruptibility.[12]
	AM No. P-04-1820 2008-08-06	OCA v. CLARITA QUINTANA-MALANAY PER CURIAM
x x x [this Court] tries to devise the appropriate action to strengthen the moral fiber and strength of character of the employees and officers that constitute the judiciary, this [C]ourt shall never be less strict in applying only the highest standards of propriety, decorum, integrity, uprightness and honesty from the highest judicial officer of the land to the humblest court employee, for the ultimate power of this court lies in its incorruptibility.[50] WHEREFORE, respondent CLARITA QUINTANA-MALANAY, Clerk of Court, MeTC, Pateros, Manila, is hereby found GUILTY of gross neglect of duty, dishonesty and grave misconduct. She is ordered DISMISSED from the service with forfeiture of all retirement benefits and with prejudice to re-employment in the government, including government-owned or controlled corporations. The Employees Leave Division, Office of Administrative Services, OCA, is DIRECTED to compute the balance of respondent Malanay's earned leave credits and forward the same to the Finance Division, Fiscal Management Office, OCA, which shall compute its monetary value. The amount, as well as other benefits she may be entitled to, shall be applied as restitution of the shortage.
	AM NO. P-03-1739 2006-04-07	OCA v. AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ PER CURIAM
"x x x [A]s [this Court] tries to device the appropriate action to strengthen the moral fiber and strength of character of the employees and officers that constitute the judiciary, this [C]ourt shall never be less strict in applying only the highest standards of propriety, decorum, integrity, uprightness and honesty from the highest judicial officer of the land to the humblest court employee, for the ultimate power of this court lies in its incorruptibility."[20]