This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-11-21 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| Based on the facts, the law and jurisprudence, Sario deserves to be dismissed for willful disobedience. In Gold City Integrated Port Services, Inc. v. NLRC,[33] the Court stressed that willful disobedience of an employee contemplates the concurrence of at least two requisites: the employee's assailed conduct must have been willful or intentional, the willfulness being characterized by a "wrongful and perverse attitude"; and the order violated must have been reasonable, lawful and made known to the employee, and must pertain to the duties which he had been engaged to discharge. We find the two requisites present in this case. | |||||