You're currently signed in as:
User

ALFREDO VELASCO v. BLAS OPLE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2005-04-26
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
    d.]   AWARDED MORAL DAMAGES IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENTS.[17]    Petitioner claims that the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the trial court's order consolidating Civil Case No. 53967 with LRC Case No. R-3951, arguing that consolidation is proper only when it involves actions, which means an ordinary suit in a court of justice by which one party prosecutes another for the enforcement or protection of a right, or a prevention of a wrong. Citing A.G. Development Corp. v. Court of Appeals,[18] petitioner posits that LRC Case No. R-3951, being summary in nature and not being an action within the contemplation of the Rules of Court, should not have been consolidated with Civil Case No. 53967.