This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-12-17 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| We are not persuaded. The evidence on hand shows that respondent judge issued the special order of demolition only after carefully determining that there was no more hindrance to issue the same. For one, the trial court, in Civil Case Nos. 1291 and 4647, had already adjudged that the land in question belonged to spouses Yu and Matualaga and even nullified the quitclaim and all documents of conveyance of sale in favor of complainants' predecessor-in-interest.[20] In fact, the records of the case disclosed that the decision of the trial court was affirmed by the CA in CA-G.R. No. 69000[21] and CA-G.R. CV No. 54003[22] and ultimately by this Court via its decision dated November 9, 1990 in G.R. No. 76487[23] and resolution dated July 19, 1999 in G.R. No. 138132.[24] | |||||