You're currently signed in as:
User

FRANCISCO P. TESORERO v. PONCIANO G. A. MATHAY

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2006-11-30
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
On 17 January 1995, respondents filed a petition before the ERB praying for the declaration of nullity of its 18 September 1989 Decision.[7] Respondents argued that said ERB decision was void ab initio because included therein were certain generators which were ordered excluded by this Court in the computation of the sound value appraisal of petitioner's properties, assets, and equipment in our decision in G.R. No. 69592.[8]
2006-11-30
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
On 17 January 1995, respondents filed a petition before the ERB praying for the declaration of nullity of its 18 September 1989 Decision.[7] Respondents argued that said ERB decision was void ab initio because included therein were certain generators which were ordered excluded by this Court in the computation of the sound value appraisal of petitioner's properties, assets, and equipment in our decision in G.R. No. 69592.[8]